The time period ‘militant democracy’ used to be coined through Karl Loewenstein within the Nineteen Thirties. He argued that makes an attempt to set up democracy within the Weimar Republic failed because of the loss of militancy opposed to subversive routine. the concept that of militant democracy was once brought to criminal scholarship and constitutional perform on the way to offer democracy with felony capacity to protect itself opposed to the variety of attainable actions of non-democratic political actors.
This booklet bargains a wide comparative examine the criminal proposal of militant democracy. It analyses either theoretical and great features of this idea, investigating its perform in a couple of nations and on a various array of concerns. reading instances in Australia, Turkey, Spain, Germany, Israel, India, the united states, and the Council of Europe, Svetlana Tyulkina maps the ancient improvement of militant democracy in constitutional conception and explores its interplay with a number of conventional and modern notions of democracy. The publication analyses the chances and pitfalls of the idea that of militant democracy whilst utilized to guard democracy whilst it really is lower than danger of damage or destruction by way of undemocratic actors, and indicates attainable suggestions and measures to beat these dangers.
In its assessment of the skill and justification for democracies to use militant democracy measures, this booklet could be of significant use and curiosity to scholars and students of public comparative constitutional legislations, overseas legislation, human rights legislations, and comparative politics.